Friday, July 20, 2012

Who’s Really to Blame for HCDE Election Errors?

hcde kay


Read all about it at:

If you didn’t see the news in Harris County this week, you may have missed the story that, due to an error, the new redistricting boundary lines were not used in the primary race for the Harris County Department of Education Board of Trustee positions. The two candidates who have the most at stake are Jarvis Johnson and Erica Lee. Everyone is pointing fingers at someone else.

So, who is actually responsible for this mess?

If I didn’t know the truth, I too would be blaming the Harris County Tax Office for messing up the HCDE primary elections. After all, blames them; Ch 13 blames them; blog.chron blames them ….
But none of them bothered to do any investigating. If they had, they would have reported a totally different story. The true story of how and why all this happened.

Read and facts and then decide for yourself.

In 1889 Harris County School Trustees held their own elections and ran all our public schools. The Texas Legislature allowed independent school districts (ISD’s) to break away from the county system starting in the 1910’s. By 1935, about half of the students in our county had moved to ISD’s but the County School Trustees insisted they needed more money. So the Texas Legislature allowed the County School Trustees to start collecting a county wide property tax called an “equalization tax” on top of the property taxes collected by the ISD’s.

The Harris County School Trustees lost all their students to ISD’s by 1966, but they continued to collect their tax.

Most County School Boards in Texas simply voted themselves closed after all their students moved into ISD’s. But the Harris County School trustees refused to close. In 1978, The Texas Legislature passed TEC 17.94 which stopped all state funding for County Trustees but left a loophole allowing county school boards that collected the “equalization tax” to remain open using those funds for support. That left only two County School Boards in Texas - one in Dallas and the other here in Harris County.tec17.94

Each ISD held their own elections. Most residents paid attention to the ISD elections because their kids attended those schools. Gradually people “just kind of forgot” that we still had a County School Board.

Then the County School Trustees came with up a name for themselves, “Harris County Department of Education.” They started using just the initials, HCDE, in their daily operations. Over time, people picked up the new name and started to assume HCDE was an actual “Department” inside the “county government” specializing in “education” even though it remained the original County School Board – a totally separate political subdivision from the county.

The more people forgot about HCDE, the more lax HCDE became about running their elections. The League of Women Voters investigated HCDE in the 1970’s and found all sorts of election violations. HCDE was not publicizing their elections, they did not list polling locations, and there were serious issues with their election processes. The wrong candidate on the ballot in the wrong precinct was a recurring problem in HCDE  elections.

Some examples of problems the League of Women Voters found in HCDE’s elections:

1969 Election
  • The election order did not list any polling places
  • Central Houston area had 3 polling places but none in Precinct 3, therefore no votes were cast for Precinct 3
1971 Election
  • Humble and Huffman areas were listed as precinct 4 although they were actually Precinct 2
  • Cy-Fair area was given 6 polling places listed for precinct 4 although half of district was Precinct 3
1973 Election
  • Election order did not list the two at-large positions # 5 and # 7
  • No polling places in La Porte or Deer Park areas were designated for Precinct 1 but votes for the Precinct 1 candidate were cast in both districts
1975 Election
  • Neither of the polling places in Central Houston area were designated for precinct 3. . No votes were cast there
  • Almost all of Cy-Fair area was within Precinct 3 but only 2 polling places were designated for 3.

lwv file001 The League of Women Voters tried to get HCDE to clean up their elections but HCDE just ignored them. Finally LWV sued HCDE using the Voting Rights Act because  HCDE was disenfranchising minority voters by holding elections at times when fewer people would be voting, and offering very few polling locations in certain areas (especially minority areas).

LWV won in Federal Court but it wasn’t easy and it took years. HCDE defied judges’ orders, refused to hold elections when ordered, changed the dates of elections, etc… HCDE was so defiant that when the case was finally over the courts  forced HCDE to re-elect 5 of their 7 board members who, the court said, had been illegally elected.

 The courts  ruled in Civil Action # H-80-143 that HCDE was:
 “enjoined from conducting future elections of County School Trustees pursuant to procedures, including choice of date for holding such elections, that have not been precleared pursuant to Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act.”

All the publicity about the LWV lawsuit brought HCDE to the forefront. People started questioning the need for a County School Board again. All that was needed to stop the wasteful tax was four good people to be elected to the board to vote it closed. 

In the early 1980’s, three Libertarians were elected to the board on a platform of shutting the obsolete board down and ending its taxing authority. Four “old timer” board members remained. When it came time for the next election more Libertarians were on the ballot and the “old timers” knew the board would be closed if another Libertarian won. The “old timers” still held the majority, so they voted NOT to hold their next election until after the Legislature met again. You read correctly. They simply voted NOT to hold a scheduled election until they could get their friends in the Texas Legislature to fix things.tec17.031

The Texas Legislature came through for their friends at HCDE big time. They passed TEC 17.031, a law that made County School Trustees “county officers” for elections. That meant they would go through the party primary election process and that all candidates on the HCDE ballot would have party affiliation next to their names. In a county where so many people vote straight party, that pretty much guaranteed that no more Libertarians would  win a seat on the HCDE board.

 And as an extra perk, the Legislature worded the law to require all HCDE board members to re-run for office in 1984 using the primary system. So for the second time in just a few years, HCDE board elections were a complete do-over.

That fixed HCDE’s problems. All Libertarians lost their seats and three “old timers” got to return. HCDE stayed open. The only change, they no longer held their own separate elections on a date of their choosing. They would always be on the general election ballot in November with county, state and national offices, even though they were still a completely separate political subdivision from the county.

The people of Harris County “kind of forgot” about the County School Board again.

hcde aka cropped In 1991, HCDE filed an “Assumed Name Certificate” in Harris County to make HCDE their legal “doing business as” name.

In 1995, the Texas Legislature reformed the entire Texas Education Code. They removed all the laws governing County School Trustees from the books because they no longer had a place in Texas Education. But the Legislature left a loophole to cover their friends which reads:

Texas Education Code section 11.301(a) A school district or county system operating under former Chapter 17,18,22,25,26,27,or 28 on May 1, 1995, may continue to operate under the applicable chapter as that chapter existed on that date and under state law generally applicable to school districts that does not conflict with that chapter.

That loophole  left Harris County taxpayers funding a county wide school system with the authority to collect a county wide property tax, with no students zoned to it, and no laws on the books for the people to know what it is supposed to be doing!

Well, now it is 2012 and HCDE elections are back in the news. Why? Because the new US Census required redistricting. All the new boundary lines require the voter registrar (tax office) and elections department to rework everything to make sure each voter is actually voting for all the right candidates.

Many lines overlap. For example, Katy ISD is split by three counties – Harris, Waller, and Fort Bend.  Counties can be split by State Board of Education boundaries, etc. The list goes on and on. According to the tax office, there  are approximately 500 separate entities with over 700 district lines.

That is why Texas Election Code 42.0615 requires political subdivisions to report their boundary changes to the County Voter Registrar (Tax Office), so the proper candidates are included in each precinct.

Should the Tax Office have automatically  changed HCDE’s boundary lines without HCDE requesting it?

First you’d have to ask - What are the HCDE’s boundaries? Simple to find out, just read the laws governing County School Board boundary lines. OOPS! The Texas Legislature removed those laws from the books 17 years ago. The only way to find out is to ask HCDE. They are the only ones with a copy of the former laws and they keep them well hidden. I had to file through Freedom of Information to get them.  hcde elections045

Second, Texas school district lines are not changed by the census. HCDE is listed as an independent school district by the  Texas Education Agency as well as the  State Comptroller’s Office. In some legal matters, HCDE declares it must be treated the same as school districts.

Third, at the beginning of the primary the Harris County Clerk’s office required that HCDE candidates complete Personal Financial Statements just like other “county officers” as required by law. In the letter below (from HCDE’s own attorney to Harris County Attorney Vince Ryan’s Office) claiming HCDE board candidates are exempt from filing Personal Financial Statements, you can see the real problem. HCDE’s own attorney lists the reason HCDE candidates are exempt as “county officers” and the reason they are exempt as “school board trustees of independent school districts.” Seems that their own attorney is not quite sure what they are either, so she covered all bases.

hcde elections042 hcde elections043 hcde elections044

 So who is to know what HCDE is? hcde elections050

Sometimes HCDE claims it is “like a school district”. 

hcde elections051

Sometimes HCDE claims it is a
political  subdivision of the Sate of Texas”
which contracts with Harris County for services

hcde tax assist006 cropped

Sometimes HCDE claims it is a
“Tax-Assisted Non-Profit”. 

hcde elections052

Sometimes HCDE claims it is a
 “local governmental entity.”

hcde elections053

Sometimes HCDE claims it is a
“county governing body.”

hcde elections054

Sometimes HCDE claims it is a
“charitable organization.” 

hcde elections055

Sometimes HCDE claims it is a
primary governmental unit and is not included in any other governmental ‘reporting entity’…
that is “separate and distinct from county agencies of Harris County.”

With no laws on the books, it is hard for anyone to know.

Should the HCDE Superintendent have informed the Tax Office of changes in the HCDE’s boundary lines due to the census?

hcde elections056
First, Texas Education Code 17.55 says that HCDE’s
Superintendent is responsible for all reports. Basically, he is the “CEO”  of day to day operations of the district.

Second, In Cause #10-0294 in the Supreme Court of Texas, HCDE declared its own legal status to be a “political subdivision of the state of Texas.”

Third, Texas Election Code 42.0615 requires political subdivisions to report changes in their boundaries to the voter registrar (tax office in Harris County). The statute reads:


  A political subdivision that changes its boundaries or the boundaries of districts 

used to elect members to the governing body of the political subdivision shall not 

later than the 30th day after the date the change is adopted:

(1)  notify the voter registrar of the county in which the area

 subject to the boundary change is located of the adopted boundary change; and

(2)  provide the voter registrar with a map of an adopted boundary change

 in a format that is compatible with the mapping format used by the registrar's office.

Added by Acts 2005, 79th Leg., Ch. 709, Sec. 1, eff. September 1, 2005.

(If this law was not added until 2005, this is the first time the boundaries have changed since the law went into effect.)

 Fourth, the HCDE board spends millions of our tax dollars each year to pay a superintendent, three assistant superintendents, two government “liaison” specialists, as well as multiple lawyers, directors and support staff. HCDE spends over $150,000 every year for a full time consultant in “School Governance,”  Dr. Richard  A. Griffin. The HCDE Trustees spend hundreds of thousands of tax dollars every year to send themselves and all the employees for training on laws, regulations and operations of the district.

All that money spent, and NOT ONE person thought to even call the Voter Registrar to check the boundary lines before or after the primary?

So who do you think is responsible ?  HCDE’s Superintendent for not turning in the request to change the boundary lines or the Voter Registrar (tax office) for not noticing HCDE had not turned in their request to change their boundary lines?

hcde elections057

The only one who has accepted any responsibility is Don Sumners, our Voter Registrar. He admits his office should have noticed that HCDE had not turned in their request to change their boundary lines. His office is also the one who found the error and sent out the notices to HCDE and the board candidates.

On the other hand, HCDE has accepted no blame. They have placed all the blame on the Tax Office. They have NOT asked for the resignation of their Superintendent. Instead, Board Member Roy Morales  said Don Sumners of the Tax Office should resign.  HCDE has mentioned nothing about the fact that they have messed up their own elections in the same way so many times in the past that the Federal Courts can’t trust them to make their own election decisions. They have implied that they are seeking help from to the Federal Courts because they care about the voters, not because they have been sanctioned by the Federal Courts in the past because of their poor election procedures.

Who do I think is responsible?     Actually, neither one.

Image of Texas Capitol.I think the Texas Legislature is at fault. They are the ones who left loopholes in the laws for their friends causing all this to happen. If the Legislature had closed all County School Boards when they removed the laws governing them from the books, none of this would have happened.

Who will suffer from this legal mess? THE HARRIS COUNTY TAXPAYERS!!!!

HCDE will waste hundreds of thousands of our education tax dollars on more lawyers for the federal courts, to sue the county and to cover their backs. Then they will spend hundreds of thousands more on political consultants, marketing specialists and lobbyists to repair the damage done by all the negative publicity and to make sure the Legislature doesn’t use this fiasco as the final straw to shut them down once and for all.

The county will waste hundreds of thousands of our tax dollars on lawyers and personnel to clean up the mess.

All this because the legislators we send to Austin don’t have the guts to simply say,

“Sorry HCDE, but it is time to close your doors. The citizens of Harris County no longer need the extra tax burden of County School Trustees.”


Anonymous said...

Excellent analysis. It needs to be closed. I examined the credit card charges a few years back and it was like a momma sow with every piglet taking money for everything under the sun. Yes the Superintendent as is the chancellor of a college district is the responsible party to report the boundaries for the elections. FIRE him and vote to close it down.

Post a Comment